

Flannery, “Philosophical Arguments Against and For ‘Humanae Vitae,’” Anthropotes 2 (December, 1994). Karl–Otto Apel, Diskurs und Verantwortung: Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990. by Louis Infield, Foreword by Lewis White Beck, Indianapolis: Hacket, 1963. and trans., New York: Harper and Row, 1986. Jean–Jacques Rousseau, The Fist and Second Discourses, Together with the Replies to Critics and Essay on the Origin of Languages, Victor Gourevitch, ed. Cohen and Andrew Arato, Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992. Janet Smith, Humanae Vitae: A Generation Later, Washington, DC: Catholic University Press of America, 1991. Jacques Maritain, The Rights of Man and Natural Law, London: Geoffrey Bles, 1944, 1958. Jane Kramer, The Politics of Memory: Looking for Germany in the New Germany, New York: Random House, 1996. Germain Grisez, Joseph Boyle, John Finnis, and William May, “‘Every Marital Act Ought to be Open to New Life’: Toward a New Understanding,” Thomist 52 (1988). Germain Grisez, Contraception and Natural Law, Milwaukee: Bruce Publishing Co., 1964. _, ed., The Essential Communitarian Reader, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998.įred Berger, “Gratitude.” Ethics 85 (July 1975). _, “Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, and the Problem of Natural Law,” Mediaevalia 4 (1978).Įtzioni, ed., New Communitarian Thinking: Persons, Virtues, Institutions, and Communities, Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1995. _, “The New Rights Theory and Natural Law,” Review of Politics 44 (1982). Brian Benestad, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996. Fortin, Human Rights, Virtue, and the Common Good: Untimely Meditations on Religion and Politics, vol. Damian Fedoryka and John Crosby, Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1969.Įrnest L. Communitarianism, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.ĭietrich von Hildebrand, The Encyclical Humanae Vitae, A Sign of Contradiction: An Essay on Birth Control and Catholic Conscience, trans. Nancy Rosenblum, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.Ĭlaudia Card, “Gratitude and Obligation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (April 1988).ĭaniel Statman, ed., Virtue Ethics, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1997.ĭavid Rasmussen, ed., Universalism vs. Stalley, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Īmitai Etzioni, The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda, New York: Crown, 1993.īernard Hoose, Proportionalism: The American Debate and its European Roots, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1987.Ĭatherine Merridale, Night of Stone: Death and Memory in Russia, London: Granta Books, 2000.Ĭharles Taylor, “Cross–Purposes: The Liberal–Communitarian Debate,” in Liberalism and Moral Life, ed. Ernest Barker, revised with an Introduction and notes by R.
BUKU FILSAFAT POLITIK TAHUN 1989 FREE
Seligman, The Idea of Civil Society, New York: Free Press, 1992.Īgnes Heller, General Ethics, Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.Īristotle, The Politics, trans.


_, After Virtue, 2nd ed., Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Īdam B. MacIntyre’s, Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues, London: Duckworth, 1999. Jika problem humilitas dipandang sepele, aktivitas politik akan mudah terjerat pada pengedepanan self-interest penguasa dan pembelakangan kepentingan umum warga.Ī. Problem humilitas dalam etika politik sangat krusial. Penerbit memberikan ijin resmi untuk dipublikasikan di Studia ini. Foley and Douglas Kries, Lexington Books, 2002. Artikel ini sedianya dimaksudkan untuk buku Gladly to Learn and Gladly to Teach: Essays on Religion and Political Philosophy in Honor of Ernest Fortin, A.A., edited by Michael P. Pembahasannya merujuk kepada kontribusi filosofis dan social teaching of the Church, buah refleksi Romo Ernest Fortin (seorang assumpsionist) yang mengajar filsafat dan teologi selama kurang lebih empat puluhan tahun di Assumption College dan Theological Department dari Boston College, USA. Artikel ini menganalisis tema-tema yang sangat penting dalam lapangan filsafat etika politik: hak, kewajiban, dan kerendahan hati.

Pengakuan atas kegagalan harus dijalankan dengan suatu strategi yang tidak boleh memalukan. Sebab karakter kerinduan opini penguasa atau yang bertanggung jawab atas tata hidup bersama selalu dalam bingkai jalan pikiran kesuksesan. Sejak Machiavelli tak pernah kerendahan hati menjadi suatu elaborasi filsafat etika politik. Tema humilitas dalam etika politik terbilang baru.
